Run the same accepted AI service on less machine.
LUMA turns your cost, power, capacity and service boundary into a machine requirement, qualifies the states that can satisfy it, then automatically selects, applies, verifies and rolls back those states as operating conditions change.
From buying boundary to controlled machine action.
You give us the model, production workload, SLO, current infrastructure and economic target. LUMA compiles the machine requirement, identifies the binding physical deficit, qualifies the highest-value intervention and turns passing states into an operating library the controller can use.
Your actual accepted service.
Model or model pool, quality rules, prompt/context distribution, concurrency, latency targets, deployment constraints, power ceiling and economic objective.
A deployable, qualified machine state.
Hardware personality, model program, state layout, runtime/backend, deployment bundle, measured service envelope and normal application-facing API.
{
"model": "qualified-model",
"messages": [...],
"stream": true
}
What the first customer-usable release actually contains.
Customer input: named model/revision, production workload distribution, accepted quality/SLO, current infrastructure and the economic boundary that matters.
LUMA return: Resource Boundary Report + qualified machine-state manifest + runtime/backend configuration + synchronized physical evidence + deployment/API bundle. A deeper FPGA persona is admitted only after offline build, place-and-route and physical qualification.
Frozen Qwen service + R1-v1 + one qualified FPGA backend path + one selected compute mechanism + L0 apply/observe/verify + TTFT/TPOT/goodput/BW/p99/power/temp evidence + first Resource Boundary Report + deployment/API bundle.
Second mechanism generations, state-safe DFX, physical integration, recovery stress, broader workloads, second-backend portability and final TRL4 transfer.
First prove you can remove resources. Then change hardware only when it pays.
LUMA searches qualified operating territory first. Deeper hardware change enters when the service requires it or when the expected machine-count, goodput or energy value repays the intervention.
Current workload, state pressure, service demand, thermal and power condition.
Find the qualified operating region that still satisfies every hard service constraint.
Select the lowest-resource / lowest-cost qualified point for the current demand, counting machine provision, accepted goodput and power.
Switch L1 or build L2 only when expected lifetime value clears transition, build and qualification cost.
The savings stay alive after the benchmark ends.
LUMA converts qualified evidence into a live control authority. Demand, context mix, concurrency, power availability and economic coefficients move; the machine state follows inside a prequalified envelope.
Optimize the customer value function continuously.
The controller observes the current service cell and complete resource vector, scores only physically qualified states, actuates the strongest candidate, probes accepted service and realized value, then commits or rolls back.
Control targets: devices required · sessions/node · wall power · J/accepted output · cost/accepted output · rack/facility envelope.
Order an Economic Control PilotStart with the question your infrastructure budget actually depends on.
The first engagement answers one concrete question: can your accepted service run on fewer accelerators, lower power, a smaller provisioned system or a cheaper machine state—and if not, which physical bottleneck prevents it?
- Representative model or model family
- Production-like workload distribution
- Quality and service requirements
- Current machine / deployment constraint
- Power, rack or cost objective
- Reproducible baseline and service contract
- Candidate lower-resource configuration
- Physical deficit and intervention path
- Measured qualification evidence where available
- Deployment / design-in recommendation
Stable, expensive inference workloads with a reason to care about every watt and accelerator.
LUMA is designed for teams that already know the service they must deliver and want a defensible path to lower provision, power or cost without relaxing the accepted result.
Data locality, fixed capacity and predictable service economics make machine-state efficiency directly valuable.
Repeated production workloads where a small improvement in cards-per-service or J/output compounds across every hour of operation.
Sites where the binding constraint is power delivery, thermal headroom, rack density or accelerator count rather than model availability.
Teams deciding whether a workload justifies low-bit, memory-centric, FPGA or custom-accelerator intervention before paying the full NRE.
Goodput, power and provenance travel together.
Public and vendor data are useful priors for sizing and experiment design. They do not substitute for qualification of a customer release on its exact physical path.
Three commercial paths, one economics-to-machine evidence chain.
Start at the decision boundary. LUMA deepens the intervention only as far as the measured customer value requires.
We are assembling the physical evidence chain behind the product.
Design customers bring a real workload and service constraint. Technical partners bring a bounded implementation or measurement capability that plugs into a named input → artifact → evidence → downstream-consumer contract.